Vikram Amar is a Distinguished Professor of Law at UC Davis, and was previously the dean and the Iwan Foundation Professor of Law at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign College of Law from 2015-2023. Amar has also taught law at Berkeley School of Law, Hastings College of Law and UCLA School of Law. Amar is one of the most eminent and frequently cited authorities in constitutional law, federal courts, and civil procedure. He has written several books and more than 60 articles in leading law reviews. He is a co-author (along with Akhil Reed Amar) of the upcoming revised multi-volume Treatise on Constitutional Law (West Publishing Co.) pioneered by Ron Rotunda and John Nowak. Read More ›
Join us for another lively Supreme Court Term discussion as Professors Amar and Dorf return to discuss the leading cases the Supreme Court decided in its most recent Term, as well as those issues that the Court failed to address. Topics may include: standing to challenge FDA approvals; gerrymandering; criticism by government officials and the use of state power to suppress speech; Chevron deference; social media content moderation restrictions and the First Amendment; state enforcement of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment; immunity against criminal prosecution for alleged official acts by former presidents; and more.
- Overview of the 2023-2024 Supreme Court Term
- How monumentally did this term change the legal landscape?
- Exploration of Cases
- Professors will discuss leading cases that were covered in the most recent Supreme Court Term, providing their legal insights and opinions
- Cases May Include:
- Garland v. Cargill, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. __ (2024)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd., 601 U.S. __ (2024)
- Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. __ (2024)
- Relentless, Inc. v. Dep't of Commerce
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton
- City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, 601 U.S. __ (2024)
- Murthy v. Missouri, 603 U.S. __ (2024)
- Other Interesting Cases and Q&A
- Professors will answer questions from the audience regarding cases, their insights, etc.
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.0 General
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.0 General
Difficulty: All Levels
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2024
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.0 General
Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2025
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.0 General
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2025
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in California, South Carolina (all levels), and North Carolina. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.0 credit hours.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.
UC Davis School of Law
Cornell Law School
Michael C. Dorf teaches constitutional law, federal courts, and related subjects at Cornell Law School. He has authored or co-authored six books and over one hundred scholarly articles and essays for law journals and peer-reviewed science and social science journals. He also writes a bi-weekly column for Verdict and publishes a popular blog, Dorf on Law: www.dorfonlaw.org. Dorf received his undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard. Read More ›