You are watching a webinar preview. To view the full webinar, log in to your Justia Connect account or sign up for free.

Overview AI Webinar Summary

The Ultimate Fourth Amendment Framework

This 90-minute session gives attorneys a complete analytical framework for evaluating any Fourth Amendment search or seizure issue. Anthony Bandiero, a former law enforcement officer turned attorney who has trained more than 100,000 officers nationwide, opens with the golden rules that govern every search and seizure analysis, then addresses the threshold question of when the Fourth Amendment applies at all under the government action and private search doctrines.

The session then applies the framework where most litigation lives: the home and its curtilage, knock and talks after Florida v. Jardines, hot pursuit and exigent entries, and community caretaking after Caniglia v. Strom. From there it turns to the reasonable expectation of privacy in the modern era, from Katz through the trespass theory revived in United States v. Jones and the tire-chalking cases, and closes with the vehicle exception under Carroll and Chambers. Attendees will leave with a repeatable structure for spotting suppression issues, evaluating officer conduct, and advising law enforcement clients.

Duration of this webinar: 90 minutes

Originally broadcast: October 1, 2026 10:00 AM PT

Webinar Highlights

This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.

00:00 Introduction

Anthony Bandiero is a former police officer turned attorney who specializes in Fourth Amendment law and has trained numerous officers across the United States. Anthony aims to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the Fourth Amendment, addressing the lack of a unified Supreme Court decision on search and seizure. He plans to discuss various Supreme Court cases and their implications for law enforcement and legal professionals.

05:27 Fourth Amendment Framework

Anthony outlines four key questions to understand the Fourth Amendment, focusing on government actors, protected areas, and the occurrence of searches or seizures. He introduces the concept of C.R.E.W., which stands for Consent, Recognized Exception, or Warrant, as essential for lawful searches and seizures. Anthony discusses the historical context of the Fourth Amendment, noting its brevity and the challenges it presents in modern legal interpretation. He stresses the importance of reasonableness in searches and the lack of a good-faith exception for warrantless searches. Anthony highlights the need for probable cause over mere possibilities and the distinction between private individuals and government agents.

21:02 Search and Seizure Analysis

Anthony discusses the nuances of determining when a private individual acts as a government agent, emphasizing the Fourth Amendment's focus on government actions. He explains the concept of abandonment and its implications for privacy expectations, using real-life examples to illustrate these points. Anthony examines cases involving private searches and the limitations on police actions without a warrant, highlighting the importance of legal authority. He stresses the significance of understanding protected areas under the Fourth Amendment, including curtilage and the implications of abandonment. Anthony concludes with the importance of balancing individual rights with law enforcement needs, ensuring actions are justified and legally grounded.

31:45 Curtilage and Privacy Issues

Anthony delves into the concept of curtilage, explaining its protection under the Fourth Amendment and its frequent misinterpretation by law enforcement. He outlines the four-factor test from Dunn to determine curtilage, including adjacency, enclosure, use, and sight screening. Anthony discusses the implications of curtilage violations, using examples to illustrate the importance of understanding this concept. He introduces the concept of knock and talks, emphasizing the need for social acceptability and the limitations of implied consent. Anthony highlights the risks of coercive police actions, using case examples to demonstrate the importance of respecting constitutional boundaries.

46:51 Legal Case Studies

Anthony examines legal case studies to illustrate the application of Fourth Amendment principles in real-world scenarios. He discusses the limitations of knock and talks and the importance of having agency or a warrant for lawful entry onto curtilage. Anthony highlights the consequences of violating curtilage, including potential civil liability and the suppression of evidence. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the boundaries of lawful police actions and the need for clear legal justification. Anthony concludes with a discussion on the implications of these cases for law enforcement practices and the importance of adhering to constitutional standards.

01:04:05 Search Types and Legal Standards

Anthony discusses the legal standards for searches and seizures, emphasizing the need for lawful access to objects in plain view. He explains the limitations of community caretaking as an exception for entering homes without a warrant. Anthony highlights the importance of articulating emergencies and the need for objective reasons to justify warrantless entries. He discusses recent Supreme Court decisions, such as Case v. Montana, which clarify the burden of proof required for entering homes. Anthony concludes with a discussion on the implications of these legal standards for law enforcement practices and the importance of adhering to constitutional principles.

Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.

Speaker

Anthony Bandiero Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Blue to Gold, LLC

Anthony Bandiero, JD, ALM, is a police officer turned attorney who has spent his career making constitutional law usable on the street. He has trained more than 100,000 officers in 47 states in Fourth Amendment law, search and seizure, and constitutional policing. Read More ›

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits

Lawyers: To receive CLE credit, you must verify your law license for free in the Justia Lawyer Directory to become a Justia Connect Practice member. Depending on the jurisdiction or course, you may be eligible for free CLE credit or may need to upgrade your membership to Justia Connect Pro. Check CLE terms for full details.

Alabama CLE

Status: Approved

Format: On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026

Alaska CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2031

California CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2028

Hawaii CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2028

Illinois CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2028

New Jersey CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.80 General

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2027

North Carolina CLE

Status: Approved

Format: On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2027

Ohio CLE

Status: Approved

Format: On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026

Pennsylvania CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2028

Texas CLE

Status: Approved

Format: On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: September 30, 2027

Vermont CLE

Status: Approved

Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand

Credits: 1.50 General

Earn Credit Until: October 1, 2031

This presentation is approved for one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Alabama, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Alaska, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in California, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Hawaii, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Illinois, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in North Carolina, one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Ohio, one and a half hours of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, and one and a half hours of General CLE credit in Vermont. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.80 hours of total CLE credit. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.50 credit hours.

Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.

Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.

At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.

Looking for CLE credit? Visit CLE Dashboard